Servant of the People, Holos, three more parties ignored elections in merged territorial communities on June 30 – CVU director general
KYIV. June 27 (Interfax-Ukraine) – Five political parties, including the Servant of the People and Holos ignored participation in elections in the merged territorial communities on June 30, Director General of the Committee of Voters of Ukraine (CVU) Oleksiy Koshel said.
"Five rating political parties ignored the elections in the merged territorial communities. These political parties are Servant of the People, Opposition Platform - For Life, Holos, Strength and Honor, and Opposition Bloc," said Koshel at a press conference in the Interfax-Ukraine agency in Kyiv on Thursday.
He noted that representatives of 36 parties took part in the elections to the merged communities.
According to Koshel, CVU observers will monitor the elections in the merged territorial communities on Sunday.
Advertising
Advertising
MORE ABOUT
Sweet.tv and Sadyba Music set national record with project for IDPs
13:55, 05.12.2025
Union of Real Estate Specialists to hold XII National Forum on Ukraine’s real estate market on Dec 12 in Kyiv
16:25, 04.12.2025
Ukraine's Economic Security Index drops from 35.2 to 33.4 points in 2025 — study
09:32, 04.12.2025
Ukraine's civil society groups join declaration protecting humanitarian workers
12:53, 17.11.2025
Minimum safety standards for humanitarian workers need improvement – Alliance of Ukrainian CSOs
11:53, 17.11.2025
LATEST
Sheriff Demining trains sappers to work with robotic “sapper assistants”
14:05, 04.12.2025
In Ukraine, a remote destructor was presented for safer and cheaper disposal of explosive devices
13:15, 04.12.2025
Ukraine launches production of Sapper's Assistant first individual robotic demining system
12:52, 04.12.2025
International Liberty Institute has presented its Economic Security Index 2025: Ukraine remains in the “orange zone” of risk
18:06, 03.12.2025
Ukrainian National Lobbyists Association calls on NACP head Viktor Pavlushchyk to stop pressure on independence of lobbying profession