Ukrainian proposal for ceasefire on civilian objects remains valid – Zelenskyy
President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that Ukraine's proposal to extend the ceasefire after Easter on civilian objects remains valid, noting that the Russian Federation continues targeted terror against Ukrainian cities.
"Ukraine proposed to extend the ceasefire after Easter and make it complete. Our proposal for a ceasefire on civilian objects also remains valid. Russia's serious readiness to talk about this is needed. There are no obstacles on the Ukrainian side and there will be no," Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram on Tuesday.
According to him, rescue operations are currently underway in Kharkiv after a strike by Russian drones, and the head of state also recalled Russian strikes on Zaporizhia, Odesa, Sumy, Kharkiv, Donetsk, and other southern regions.
"All this is absolutely conscious Russian terror, which is stopped by one order, but an order in Russia and for the Russian army. Easter proved this, when there were no air alerts in Ukraine," Zelenskyy noted.
Advertising
Advertising
MORE ABOUT
Belgian PM agrees Ukraine shouldn’t be left without funding following Thursday's EU summit - Zelenskyy
15:45, 18.12.2025
Peace is not cheap, it's priceless - Costa welcoming Zelenskyy to EC meeting
13:56, 18.12.2025
Zelenskyy arrives at EU summit
11:51, 18.12.2025
Zelenskyy: Not letting Ukraine use Russian assets will disrupt dialogue and diplomacy
10:56, 18.12.2025
Zelenskyy: Some differences remain on issue of territories, frozen assets of the Russian Federation and others
10:37, 18.12.2025
LATEST
USA, Europe offer multi-level security guarantees for Ukraine after war – media
21:43, 18.12.2025
US Senate approves 2026 defense budget, $400 mln allocated for Ukraine – Stefanishyna
21:41, 18.12.2025
Shmyhal discusses developing security cooperation with new Czech defense minister
20:54, 18.12.2025
Ukrainian MFA responds to statement by Serbian Minister of Information: Fly won’t enter closed mouth
20:39, 18.12.2025
Ukrainian Exchange wins first-instance court ruling in license dispute with securities regulator